Table of Contents - Europe PFAS: 2026–2036

Section 1 – Market Overview and Litigation Case Studies

  • Setting the Scene: Sources of PFAS Contamination in Drinking Water
  • PFAS Contamination Cycle in Drinking Water
  • European Union – Pollution Hot Spots
  • Pathway to PFAS Regulation
  • PFAS Litigation Study Case I: 3M, Netherlands (1/2)
  • PFAS Litigation Study Case I: 3M, Netherlands (2/2)
  • PFAS Litigation Study Case II: Chemours, Netherlands (1/2)
  • PFAS Litigation Study Case II: Chemours, Netherlands (2/2)
  • PFAS Litigation Study Case III: Miteni, Italy (1/2)
  • PFAS Litigation Study Case III: Miteni, Italy (2/2)
  • PFAS Litigation Study Case IV: Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany (1/2)
  • PFAS Litigation Study Case IV: Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany (2/2)

Section 2 - Trends, Drivers, and Inhibitors

  • EU – Drinking Water Regulations
  • EU – Other Related Regulations
  • EU – Policy on PFAS in Drinking Water
  • EU – Countries Leading in PFAS Action
  • Drinking Water Regulation Timeline Overview
  • Overview of National Regulation Stringency
  • PFAS Treatment Technologies
  • Established and Emerging Technologies – Water
  • PFAS Drinking Water Treatment Maturity Curve
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Germany
  • Italy
  • The Netherlands
  • Sweden
  • Contamination Hot Spots by Country (1/2)
  • Contamination Hot Spots by Country (2/2)

Section 3 – Market Sizing and Forecasts

  • Market Sizing Calculation Overview
  • Inputs & Assumptions Overview
  • Market Sizing Scope & Methodology (1/2)
  • Market Sizing Scope & Methodology (2/2)
  • The Big Picture – Overview of Europe PFAS Drinking Water Market Opportunity
  • CAPEX vs. OPEX – Breakdown of Key Technologies
  • Market Outlook for PFAS Drinking Water Spend by Country
  • Comparing TOTEX in Countries with Emerging Opportunities
  • Breakdown of Europe PFAS Drinking Water Market by Technology & Plant Size
  • PFAS Drinking Water Market Divides into Capital and Operational Spend
  • PFAS Drinking Water Market Scenarios
  • Germany PFAS Treatment Outlook
  • Italy PFAS Treatment Outlook
  • France PFAS Treatment Outlook
  • Spain PFAS Treatment Outlook
  • Finland PFAS Treatment Outlook
  • Norway PFAS Treatment Outlook
  • Sweden PFAS Treatment Outlook
  • Belgium PFAS Treatment Outlook
  • Denmark PFAS Treatment Outlook
  • The Netherlands PFAS Treatment Outlook

Section 4 – Competitive Landscape

  • Competitive Landscape
  • Market Filtering Summary
  • PFAS Vendor Value Chain
  • Comparing Positioning in PFAS Treatment for Drinking Water
  • PFAS Drinking Water Technology Providers: Portfolio Comparison (1/4)
  • PFAS Drinking Water Technology Providers: Portfolio Comparison (2/4)
  • PFAS Drinking Water Technology Providers: Portfolio Comparison (3/4)
  • PFAS Drinking Water Technology Providers: Portfolio Comparison (4/4)

Section 5 – Company Profiles

  • ECT2
  • Gradiant
  • Nijhuis Saur Industries
  • Ovivo
  • Pollet Water Group
  • Suez
  • Veolia
  • Waterleau
  • AECOM
  • ZÜBLIN Umwelttechnik
  • Aquagga
  • Arvia Technology
  • Axine
  • Oxyle
  • Synergen Met
  • Colas Environnement
  • CarboTech
  • Chemviron
  • Chromafora
  • DESOTEC
  • instrAction
  • Jacobi Group
  • Kemira
  • Lanxess
  • De Nora
  • Puraffinity